首页> 外文OA文献 >Reducing Emissions from Deforestaton and Forest Degradation (REDD+) – What is Behind the Idea and What is the Role of UN-REDD and Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF)?
【2h】

Reducing Emissions from Deforestaton and Forest Degradation (REDD+) – What is Behind the Idea and What is the Role of UN-REDD and Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF)?

机译:减少森林砍伐和森林退化(REDD +)的排放–想法背后是什么?联合国REDD和森林碳伙伴基金(FCPF)的作用是什么?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and purpose: Although greenhouse gases related with the Land Use, Land Use Changes and the Forestry (LULUCF) represent approximately 15-20% of all greenhouse gases emissions to the atmosphere, afforestation/reforestation projects of Kyoto protocol related Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) represents only 0.75% of all CDM projects. All these facts prompted re-negotiation of climate change policy to include Reducing Emissions of Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) in compliance carbon trading in the Post-Kyoto protocol. To help implementing the REDD+ in developing countries, two main multilateral readiness programs were established, the UN one (UN-REDD+), and the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), which was created by the World Bank. This paper describes the main idea behind REDD+ mechanism, the roles of UN-REDD and FCPF in creating REDD+ national policies and what are the challenges and main obstacles in successful implementation of REDD+. Material and methods: Review of the existing literature like reports and publications related to REDD+ in general, as well as related with UN-REDD and FCPF roles in REDD+ implementation in sub- national, national and supra-national policies. Discussion and conclusion: For successful implementation of REDD+ it is necessary to deal with the problems of governance (weak institution, corruption, lack of transparency and participation) that are common present in most of the tropical countries involved in REDD+. The implementation of an effective REDD+ mechanism will need an improved capacity building and law enforcement. The analysis of UN-REDD and FCPF program reveals large overlapping, especially in current phase of capacity building. At present, it seems that UN-REDD maintains a more social oriented approach, while FCPF focuses more on carbon sequestration projects.
机译:背景与目的:尽管与土地利用,土地利用变化和林业(LULUCF)有关的温室气体约占大气中所有温室气体排放量的15-20%,但《京都议定书》相关的清洁发展机制(CDM)造林/再造林项目)仅占所有CDM项目的0.75%。所有这些事实促使人们重新谈判气候变化政策,包括在《后京都议定书》的合规碳交易中减少森林砍伐和森林退化的排放(REDD +)。为了帮助在发展中国家实施REDD +,建立了两个主要的多边准备方案,一个是联合国(UN-REDD +),另一个是由世界银行创建的森林碳伙伴基金(FCPF)。本文介绍了REDD +机制背后的主要思想,UN-REDD和FCPF在制定REDD +国家政策中的作用以及成功实施REDD +的挑战和主要障碍是什么。材料和方法:审查现有文献,例如与REDD +有关的报告和出版物,以及与UN-REDD和FCPF在国家,国家和超国家政策实施REDD +中的作用有关。讨论与结论:为了成功实施REDD +,有必要解决大多数参与REDD +的热带国家普遍存在的治理问题(体制薄弱,腐败,缺乏透明度和参与性)。实施有效的REDD +机制将需要改善能力建设和执法。对UN-REDD和FCPF计划的分析显示出很大的重叠,特别是在能力建设的当前阶段。目前,UN-REDD似乎保持了一种更加面向社会的方法,而FCPF则更多地关注碳封存项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号